Last weekend we finally got around to digging out The Duchess on Virgin's pay-for facility (I'm slow off the mark, I know) and what a disappointment... I mean, it looked gorgeous, but Keira Knightley made Georgiana look, unfortunately, like a pouting airhead. Ralph Fiennes did a fine job, but his role was one-dimensional and really did the Duke of Devonshire a disservice. The special UK spin (namely, Princess Diana 'there are three people in this marriage') was tiresome, and lines like 'Any sign of a Revolution yet?' [addressed to Charles Grey on his return from France] made me hoot with laughter. I thought Georgiana was a woman passionately interested in politics? Com'on Paramount, credit us with some intelligence!
I still haven't seen it, but that's the impression I get from the trailers. But then, what film does do justice to history? The only one I can think of is The Crucible, sort of; just because it's actually a great film and has a lot of accurate details (even though the storyline is total fiction).
Hello ladies, I'm a big fan of Alan Bennett and I thought his The Madness of King George definitely gave a very rounded and human portrayal of the king, but then, he's an amazing writer. The Duchess had a terrible script, and any amount of fabulous costumes can't hide that.
Eliza - I have seen one film that does history (or at least, a historical novel) justice, and believe it or not, it's "Master and Commander". I don't remotely like Russell Crowe normally - but I've never seen any historical film that captures the look, the feel and the whole texture of the period so perfectly and believably. I was dreading the idea of a film version of Patrick O'Brien, but I was bowled over.
You honestly wouldn't believe that an action film could be done with such care, such historical sensitivity, and such atention to detail - yet still feel so alive and believable. And, incredibly, it does justice to the language of the books, and the understated emotional relationships at their heart. It's note-perfect. Not a bit of dumbing-down in sight. If you haven't seen it (and, let's face it, who wouldn't run a mile from anything marketed as a blockbuster action adventure with Russell Crowe?), you're missing a unique Napoleonic-era treat.
The Duchess, though - boy, whst a turkey. It was even worse than "Marie Antoinette".
I'd swear you were my friend Liz if it weren't for that "I don't normally like Russell Crowe" line. She was in love with that film, and never stopped talking about it. Therefore, yes, I've seen it. That was a couple of years ago, so I'm a little foggy, but I remember that it was really violent and unpleasant--a guy performed surgery on himself and a kid's arm was cut off. I had to leave in the middle because I was "afraid of missing my train". But then, yeah, ship life wasn't pretty. So it's ironic that I praise The Crucible, which shows people being hanged, whipped, and even pressed to death!
I live in the English cathedral city of Lichfield, which, despite having a population of fewer than 5,000 during the Georgian period, was home to many important artists and intellectuals including Samuel Johnson, David Garrick and Erasmus Darwin. I generally blog about the short 18th century (1715-1789), feisty Georgian ladies and Lichfield's 18th-century heritage. If you have any comments, feel free to email me at woffington [at] gmail [dot] com.
Virtually forgotten today, Margaret Woffington (also known as Peg or Peggy) would rise from humble origins to become one of Georgian London’s most famous actresses, sharing the stage with the likes of David Garrick and excelling in so-called ‘breeches roles’. Born around the year 1720 in Dublin, her childhood years were marred by the death of her father, which plunged her family into poverty. Having reputedly sold watercress barefoot in the streets of the Irish capital, she was soon talent-spotted by a tumbler known as Violante, who staged populist entertainments in booths around the city. Violante had a troupe of child actors called the Liliputians, and before long Woffington was making her debut as Polly Peachum in their version of The Beggar’s Opera. Moving to London, she gained plaudits for both her outstanding beauty and her talent – particularly in comedy – appearing at both Covent Garden and Drury Lane. Known for her quick wit and no-nonsense attitude, she had high-profile affairs with Garrick, Lord Darnley and Charles Hanbury Williams; she was also a generous benefactor, supporting her elderly mother and may even have endowed some almshouses in Teddington, where she had settled at the height of her success. She died, unmarried, in 1760, having suffered a long wasting illness, and is buried in Teddington's parish church of St Mary’s.
Step into the past...
Click on the shoes for a highlight from the archive.
Any copyrighted excerpts on these pages are intended as Fair Use, that is to say, for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, but will be removed at the request of copyright holder(s). I do not advertise on this site, but from time to time I post links to products on Amazon.co.uk which may earn me a small referral fee via the Amazon Associates Program. However, I am selective about endorsing products and choose only those that are of genuine interest to my readership.
5 comments:
Sigh...the movie just did not do Georgiana justice.
I still haven't seen it, but that's the impression I get from the trailers. But then, what film does do justice to history? The only one I can think of is The Crucible, sort of; just because it's actually a great film and has a lot of accurate details (even though the storyline is total fiction).
Hello ladies, I'm a big fan of Alan Bennett and I thought his The Madness of King George definitely gave a very rounded and human portrayal of the king, but then, he's an amazing writer. The Duchess had a terrible script, and any amount of fabulous costumes can't hide that.
Eliza - I have seen one film that does history (or at least, a historical novel) justice, and believe it or not, it's "Master and Commander". I don't remotely like Russell Crowe normally - but I've never seen any historical film that captures the look, the feel and the whole texture of the period so perfectly and believably. I was dreading the idea of a film version of Patrick O'Brien, but I was bowled over.
You honestly wouldn't believe that an action film could be done with such care, such historical sensitivity, and such atention to detail - yet still feel so alive and believable. And, incredibly, it does justice to the language of the books, and the understated emotional relationships at their heart. It's note-perfect. Not a bit of dumbing-down in sight. If you haven't seen it (and, let's face it, who wouldn't run a mile from anything marketed as a blockbuster action adventure with Russell Crowe?), you're missing a unique Napoleonic-era treat.
The Duchess, though - boy, whst a turkey. It was even worse than "Marie Antoinette".
I'd swear you were my friend Liz if it weren't for that "I don't normally like Russell Crowe" line. She was in love with that film, and never stopped talking about it. Therefore, yes, I've seen it. That was a couple of years ago, so I'm a little foggy, but I remember that it was really violent and unpleasant--a guy performed surgery on himself and a kid's arm was cut off. I had to leave in the middle because I was "afraid of missing my train". But then, yeah, ship life wasn't pretty. So it's ironic that I praise The Crucible, which shows people being hanged, whipped, and even pressed to death!
Post a Comment